If you pertained to this page due to the fact that you just purchased a Remington 770 or someone provided you one and also you wanted to see what deserve to be improved or is a problem: sorry, this article is no super positive. If you pertained to this short article because you wanted to number out if you should buy a 770 or not: don’t. Ns don’t consider myself a gun snob. Ns think the Savage Axis and also many the the various other budget-priced bolt action rifle room pretty damn good for the price. This rifle is not. I didn’t even get to take pictures of it, since the 2nd one I acquired (first to be defective), couldn’t room a round.

You are watching: Remington 30-06 model 770

I’m walking to completely buck the tendency that I usage with most of my reviews. There are no high res images, there is a video clip that shows some problems with the rifle the are difficult to describe in text, and all the headings are going to it is in different. That’s due to the fact that I’m going to try to convince any type of readers who room on the fence to not to buy this rifle.

**Update: It appears that this rifle may be discontinued. The is not available anymore in many shops in Canada or the US. An excellent riddance!**

Remington 770 video Review

Not my image, found on Reddit.

The magazine Sucks

These days, use of plastic and mass-manufactured components for hunting rifle magazines is expected. In part uses, plastic is a far better material. What I’ve freshly is that some rifle manufacturers have made really smart use of plastic in magazines (like the Browning X-bolt), conversely, others have made negative use of worse plastics. The Remington 770 uses a poorly design magazine. The steel they determined to use has tiny springiness come it and takes bends quickly. The steel mag body attaches come the plastic floorplate by method of 2 tiny ridges cut into the inside of the floorplate. So, the attachment method is nice poor, and the metal tabs the make for that attachment bend. This is why girlfriend may have seen pictures of the magazine “exploding” the floorplate, spring, and rounds out the bottom that the rifle upon firing. Making use of the disassembly an approach recommended in the manual on the magazine, and you may present a bend on the mag body tab. That bend weakens the connection with the floorplate and also makes it an ext likely the your magazine will self-disassemble as soon as the rifle is fired. On height of that, the metal is fairly thick, therefore the mag is still heavier 보다 it requirements to be. You have the right to buy instead of mags for as low as $10, but you’re getting every little thing that you payment for.

The magazine is also jerky trying come insert right into the magwell, bumping and stopping follow me the way. Ram it house at your peril: the mag is not particularly strong. It likewise doesn’t fit against the magwell particularly smooth.

The activity Sucks

By itself, a 3 lug bolt is kinda cool. They market slightly faster cycling and more clearance versus the scope bell 보다 a 2 lug bolt. In this implementation, that doesn’t overcome whatever else wrong through the action. The barrel is pressed into the receiver rather of threaded or by utilizing a barrel nut. By itself, that’s one inexpensive means to mate barrels and also receivers, but it requires a bit more QC to make certain they have been pressed come the appropriate length. In the case of the second 770 ns tried, the chamber was as well tight, and chambering factory 7mm Remington Magnum ammunition was very difficult. Check firing would have recorded the disastrous worry on this rifle. If you’ve obtained this far into the article and also are beginning to think the I’m a total snob and that ns should have actually just put some polishing on the bolt: ns don’t intend that new firearms need work to it is in usable. Ns don’t mental tweaking because that accuracy or to enhance things, yet I draw the heat at dysfunctional.

Inside the behind of the receiver is a sleeve that plastic that is attached to the (also plastic) rear tang. I’d imagine that this method required much less work and also fitting than an all steel rear receiver. Unfortunately, the plastic bends and lets the bolt head tie as the moves with the inside of the receiver. Also after oiling it and also working the hell out of it, the bolt is quiet pretty gritty.

The bolt avoid is a small latch on the left next of the receiver. Top top the inside, it moves a half-moon item of steel to act together the bolt stop. Simply from loosely working the bolt, this half moon began to take it on a dent. Perhaps it’d it is in fine, or probably if it took a little bit of abuse it’d begin to fail to store the bolt native coming out of the receiver. Some other 770 owners have complained around their bolt stops failing.

The stock Sucks

I deserve to forgive a cheap share on a cheap rifle, a couple of things top top the stock to be a little bit weird. The create guard looks prefer it was designed ugly ~ above purpose. The buttpad is pretty hard. My rifle’s barrel wasn’t free-floated; I’m not sure if that’s a style flaw or on purpose. Most rifles free-float the barrel as an easy means to get more consistency. Then, there are those plastic, molded in sling attachment points. This aren’t meant to be provided with a bipod, and from what I’ve viewed online, castle can and also do rip turn off if you regulate to put too lot torsional pressure ~ above them.

The limit Sucks

Of course the border sucks. Ns don’t watch that therefore a substantial problem, since most hunters would certainly upgrade the limit on a rifle choose this ~ their an initial year hunting and a crappy limit is intended at this price point. The fact that the windage turret fell off in my hands on the first unboxed 770 I gained wasn’t terrifically trust inspiring.

What doesn’t suck?

I thought the safety and security was fine. It was basic to actuate and also easy to reach.The create was fine because that a rifle at this price point. The came through some travel and also grit, yet I might live with it.Accuracy is an alleged to be good. My rifle was unusable, so ns wouldn’t know. To it is in fair: accuracy on every the modern, cheap bolt action rifles is an extremely good. 1 MOA or much less should be intended from any new bolt action.

Is it OK because that the Price?

When talking about features and quality, ns always try to called those to the price point of the rifle. Let me simply be blunt: the Savage Axis is the same price and is not so sucky. The Ruger American is a bit an ext in price and also a lot better and the Remington 783 is likewise a lot far better than the 770. There is no those rifles in the market, the Remington 770 could be OK because that the price. But due to the fact that those rifles space on the market at those prices, the 770 is not good for the price. It’d need to be approximately $200-$250 and even then, it’d only for those with an ext time and also patience than a little much more money.

See more: What Is Half Of 5/16 In Fraction S, What Is Half Of 5/16

I have returned mine 770 because it wouldn’t chamber rounds without needing a hard whack on the bolt. Ns upgraded to one more rifle that doesn’t suck therefore much.