*
Civil Rights Litigation aramuseum.org HOME ABOUT FOR TEACHERS SEARCH QUESTIONS RECENT ADDITIONS feedback/suggestions log in/register


You are watching: City of canton ohio v harris

Case Name City of Canton v. Harris JC-OH-0014
Docket / Court 5:80-cv-00018-SHB ( N.D. Ohio )
State/Territory Ohio
Case Type(s) Jail Conditions
Attorney Organization ACLU National (all projects)
Case Summary
This civil rights case is important doctrinally; the United States Supreme Court clarified the standard under which cities and counties could be liable for constitutional violations that occurred due to failure to train or supervise their employees.On January 8, 1980, Plaintiff, ... read more >
- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues Affected Gender
Female
Constitutional Clause
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Due Process
Equal Protection
Unreasonable search and seizure
General
Personal injury
Staff (number, training, qualifications, wages)
Medical/Mental Health
Medical care, general
Mental health care, general
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Type of Facility
Government-run
Causes of Action 42 U.S.C. § 1983


See more: Support For Graphics Drivers For Intel R 82945G Express Chipset Family Driver

See this case at CourtListener.com (May provide additional documents and, for active cases, real-time alerts)
City of Canton, Ohio v. Harris Oyez Date: November 08, 1988 By: Oyez < Detail > < External Link >