Civil civil liberties Litigation aramuseum.org home about for TEACHERS find questions RECENT additions feedback/suggestions log in/register

You are watching: City of canton ohio v harris

instance Name City that Canton v. Harris JC-OH-0014
Docket / Court 5:80-cv-00018-SHB ( N.D. Ohio )
State/Territory Ohio
case Type(s) Jail problems
Attorney company ACLU nationwide (all projects)
Case summary
This civil rights case is essential doctrinally; the United claims Supreme Court clarified the standard under i m sorry cities and counties might be liable for constitutional violations that occurred due to fail to train or supervise their employees.On January 8, 1980, Plaintiff, ... Read an ext >
- click come show/hide all -
Issues and Causes that Action
click come show/hide detail
problems Affected Gender
Constitutional Clause
Cruel and also Unusual punishment
Due procedure
Equal security
unreasonable search and also seizure
an individual injury
employee (number, training, qualifications, wages)
Medical/Mental Health
clinical care, basic
Mental health care, general
Plaintiff Type
private Plaintiff
Type the Facility
reasons of action 42 U.S.C. § 1983

See more: Support For Graphics Drivers For Intel R 82945G Express Chipset Family Driver

check out this instance at CourtListener.com (May provide additional documents and, for active cases, real-time alerts)
City that Canton, Ohio v. Harris Oyez Date: November 08, 1988 By: Oyez < detail > < External connect >