*
Civil civil liberties Litigation aramuseum.org home about for TEACHERS find questions RECENT additions feedback/suggestions log in/register


You are watching: City of canton ohio v harris

instance Name City that Canton v. Harris JC-OH-0014
Docket / Court 5:80-cv-00018-SHB ( N.D. Ohio )
State/Territory Ohio
case Type(s) Jail problems
Attorney company ACLU nationwide (all projects)
Case summary
This civil rights case is essential doctrinally; the United claims Supreme Court clarified the standard under i m sorry cities and counties might be liable for constitutional violations that occurred due to fail to train or supervise their employees.On January 8, 1980, Plaintiff, ... Read an ext >
- click come show/hide all -
Issues and Causes that Action
click come show/hide detail
problems Affected Gender
female
Constitutional Clause
Cruel and also Unusual punishment
Due procedure
Equal security
unreasonable search and also seizure
General
an individual injury
employee (number, training, qualifications, wages)
Medical/Mental Health
clinical care, basic
Mental health care, general
Plaintiff Type
private Plaintiff
Type the Facility
Government-run
reasons of action 42 U.S.C. § 1983


See more: Support For Graphics Drivers For Intel R 82945G Express Chipset Family Driver

check out this instance at CourtListener.com (May provide additional documents and, for active cases, real-time alerts)
City that Canton, Ohio v. Harris Oyez Date: November 08, 1988 By: Oyez < detail > < External connect >